Definativley defining a reboot

Can anyone definitively define what a reboot is? The term has been around for decades but it was made popular with the release of Batman Begins in 2005, and since then, countless films have been labeled "reboot" as a lazy way to capitalize on Begin's success. In order for a film to be classed as a reboot, it has to be set in a new continuity from previous films and to have a different style.

The way I see it there are two different kinds of reboots; financially and aesthetically. Financial reboots are films that are labeled so by executives because, like I said, of the terms connotations with "Batman Begins". Aesthetic reboots are the opposite. These are films that are reboots based on how they are made and weather they have any connections to previous films. Also, it is worth mentioning that in order for a reboot to be a "reboot", said reboot will need to spawn sequels, otherwise this reboot attempt has failed.

Financial reboots:                 

1. Star Trek 
2. Dredd
3. Conan the Barbarian
4. Friday the 13th
5. X-men: First Class

Aesthetic Reboots:

1. Batman Begins
2. Man of Steel
3. Casino Royale
4. The Amazing Spider-man

Pierce Brosnan is the best Bond

Pierce Brosnan is the best Bond. People normally say that its either Connery or Craig, but their wrong. Brosnan didn't put a foot wrong during his four film stint. He had the looks, looked convincing in gun battles and fist fights and was funny. Ironically he was in the lesser films in the series, apart from Goldeneye. Tomorrow Never Dies, The World is Not Enough and Doe Another Day are normally placed at the lower half of "best Bonds" lists.

Sean Connery looked bored halfway through his stay, Lazenby didn't make enough movies, Roger Moore was great early on but looked to old for the action as the years went on, Timothy Dalton gave Bond that hard edge found in the novels but didn't seem as comfortable with the lighter moments and Daniel Craig was great in Casino Royale and Skyfall but too moody in Quantum of Solace. But Brosnan was consistant with everything. Him being in the lesser movies makes his performances even more impressive.